On Jan 10, 2008 10:58 AM, Majorly axel9891@googlemail.com wrote:
Everyone getting it is clearly a bad idea - many users have already been rejected, and they would have had to have been blocked if they'd got it automatically.
All the better to weed out the edit warriors.
Blocking is not the way to solve it. And your idea doesn't remove the idea of a "clique"
Yes it does, there would not be another tier of user between editors and Jimbo.
your idea is "innocent until proven guilty" approach - but as we've seen, it simply wouldn't work.
{{fact}}
How is that approach any different from how we let anons edit most of our pages?