doc wrote:
Perhaps it is time to look again at out "default is keep" in areas where we have a maintenance problem that is damaging us. A gentle move towards "we keep what we agree to keep", in these specific areas, is perhaps overdue.
This is certainly a retrograde proposal. These maintenance problems are with with certain editors, not with the articles. Making life difficult for the good-faith editors just because their articles tend to be the favorite targets of various problem editors is too much like punishing the victim instead of the offender.
Ec