On 29/02/2008, Majorly <axel9891(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 29/02/2008, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> We could restrict RfB to trusted editors, but you would need to define
> trusted
> editors more broadly than just admins.
Can't think of much worse than that... way too much instruction and process
creep. Let me guess, you'll next want to propose an edit count and time
limit for who can vote on RfA/Bs?
I'm not proposing anything, I'm just saying that it's not an idea I
would dismiss out of hand. I agree that it's unlikely a good
definition of "trusted editor" can be found.