I'm not sure I understand the cut and paste comment in your e-mail.
Nonetheless, I am sure that the only precedent there has ever been for
citing information contained in another article is to link a [[relevant
section of the sentence]] to the other article. The indirection of moving
this information to the end of the article has no merit that I am aware of
and is a slippery slope to practices that are clearly harmful.
I've taken note of this conversation and will compile a list of all
offending links once our mysql server is done with an upgrade.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:57 AM, David Goodman <dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
And with such a method of citing, it'll be easy to
catch them at it.
At present they do it by cut and paste.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Brian <Brian.Mingus(a)colorado.edu> wrote:
This works in a peer reviewed system. As
we've seen in this case,
however,
there is only accidental oversight and people
will certainly take
advantage
of this to give an article in which they have a
vested interest the
vestige
of authority.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Goodman <dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> "as per the sources cited here" is exactly the way to do it-- the
> usual academic equivalent is "per X, and the references cited
> therein". Something should certainly be stated, not just be implied.
> This might be a good way of documenting lists, where the reasons for
> the individual items are in the articles on the items.
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On
Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net
> wrote:
> > > Of course! What's unfortunate is that some people are more
> comfortable
> > > with hard rules than with reasonableness. There are times when
> citing
> > > another Wikipedia article is perfectly appropriate.
> >
> > Citing a particular revision, perhaps - the live article is too
moving
> > a target. And it should only be done
as a 'per the sources cited
> > here' way - the Wikipedia article itself is not the reliable
source,
> > but perhaps it might be worthwhile on
occasion to refer to the set
of
references in an article collectively.
-Matt
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l