Include a link on the "show/hide" button the WP:NOT#CENSORED (or wherever
our policy on that is nowadays) should satisfy those who are offended by
publishing the images. And if it doesn't...tough.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Thinboy00 (Wikipedia mailing list) <
thinboy00+wikipedialist(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The *real* problem though, is that some Muslims are
offended by the
very publishing of the images. I don't think we should go so far as
to remove them entirely, instead, we should satisfy the more realistic
request to make them "hidable."
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Alex G <g1ggyman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Nice idea. I'm thinking we should try and go
ahead with this...if
images
are showing by default, there really isn't
much "bad" about this
solution.
AFAIK this would go in sitewide monobook.js, correct? We could also
add a
Special:Prefs option to have the images default
showing/default hiding.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Raphael Wegmann <raphael(a)psi.co.at>
wrote:
> Jimmy Wales schrieb:
> > Andrew Gray wrote:
> >> The basic problem is that when a debate is binary - include or
don't
> >> include - we can't really
compromise with both sides unless we get
> >> interestingly creative...
> >
> > I agree with Andrew that we should try to think beyond the simple
binary
> > debate and look for interestingly
creative solutions. I suspect
> > actually that in time, with sufficient creative genius, we can come
up
with a quasi-Pareto-improving solution.
I've tried a new compromise in a sandbox page.
It has almost no impact for the pro-image proponents
as it only adds an ambox template on top of the page.
All images stay per default visible.
The ambox at the top of the page is offering our readers
to hide all depictions of Muhammad with one click.
Since we agreed to have a calligraphy as a lead image,
those who don't want to see any depiction of Muhammad
can just click the link in the ambox and read our article
with all depictions of Muhammad hidden in collapsed tables.
Unfortunately this solution needs some additional
javascript (collapseAllTables() and expandAllTables()).
If you want to see my compromise in action, you'll
need to copy my
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Raphael1/monobook.js
After refreshing your browser cache (Shift-Reload),
you should be able to see my compromise at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Raphael1/Muhammad
To implement this compromise, we should think
about a more general approach, something like a
Template:CTbox (CollapseTablesBox).
br
--
Raphael
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Sincerely,
[[User:Thinboy00]]
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l