> Indeed, if we had an article on [[Gerbilling]],
no doubt one of our
> selfless editors would provide a photo of the activity that'd be stuck
> front & center. It's just not very relevant to Gerbils, which is why
> it's not there.
Yet if I put a picture of a gerbil against a cloudy sky in the article on
gerbils, nobody would say "clouds are irrelevant to gerbils" and take the
picture out until someone removed the clouds from the picture. Relevance
isn't enough; offensiveness matters.