On 14/02/2008, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 14/02/2008, Chris Howie
<cdhowie(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> This was sent directly to me and not to the list, but I'm replying
on-list.
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:08 PM, AB
<diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
> > > On 14/02/2008, Chris Howie
<cdhowie(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Damned if we do, damned if we don't. I'd rather we be considered
> > > insensitive than unecyclopedic, considering that we are an
> > > encyclopedia.
> >
> > No, WP is not an encyclopaedia. No encyclopaedia I know of
> > sends violent thugs to threaten to turn its critics black and blue.
> > WP does. WP is a mob.
>
> Please provide a citation for this claim. I am not aware of any such
incident.
Please don't feed Armed Blowfish on the list.
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Sorry, I don't want to feed the trolls, but this is a serious
allegation. Shouldn't we look into it, regardless of the source?
Not that I believe any Wikipedian in a million years would do such a
thing, but is it worth the risk of being wrong?
Has a moderator looked at my message yet?
Again, if Armed Blowfish's allegation has already been looked
at an proven false, I am sorry to disturb, but when it comes to
such serious matters, I am obligated to ask.