> Here is a
thought. Perhaps the image can be collapsed, in the same
> manner we do our {{hat}} {{hab}} collapsible text blocks.
>
> ./scream
>
>
If one does not have Javascript enabled do those blocks work? Are they
stuck open or closed in that case?
Just thinking about accessibility, the idea is fine with me as a
useful compromise which is in no way censoring the picture, just
requiring a distinct action to want to see it. Equating censorship
with not immediately seeing the pictures would be more idealistic than
pragmatically useful in my opinion.
Peter
I'm not all that up on the javascript issue, however, if this is the
case, a good workaround would be to :link the picture under the
hat/hab. :linked pictures do not show, but as a link, you must click
them to go to the pic page. So "If you can not "show" the picture
above, click here..." or similar. Thoughts?
./scream
That is an elegant fallback for non-javascript users. Suits me.
Peter