On Feb 13, 2008 8:32 AM, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Wikipedia-s-neutrality-is-a-facade...
Discuss. The opening synopsis doesn't even make sense to me.
Steve
The academic's original piece (linked from that article), is at: < http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=6954%3E. The main issue is of "reliable sources" - and the insinuation that ZMag/Net was being dismissed offhand as a source. If that is being done in practice - and I haven't looked up the page in controversy, nor followed anything similar - then Mr Anderson has a point, even though I think he should have stuck it out patiently, rather than go ranting on the web when something didn't go his way immediately.
Cormac