Isn't that list a particularly bad example? It merely mentions the
particular Quite Interesting things brought up, and makes no effort to
duplicate banter. Actually, I've enjoyed looking through it tremendously -
some of that stuff is *really* interesting. And much more actually
encyclopaedic than "On the surface, tumbleweeds blow across dirt tracks as
the landing party make their way towards the buildings. T'Pol doesn't detect
signs of weapons fire. Archer sends Mayweather to the communications tower
to see if the data buffer is intact in order to copy their last
transmissions." (From a random ST:E episode article.)
RR
On Feb 10, 2008 8:11 AM, Earle Martin <wikipedia(a)downlode.org> wrote:
What's the polite way of saying "grotesquely
over-detailed summaries
like these need to be attacked brutally with a chainsaw"? And what
talk page can I say it on?
Prompted by this sort of thing, which just makes me put my head in my
hands.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_QI_episodes_(E_series)<http://en.wi…
--
Earle Martin
http://downlode.org/
http://purl.org/net/earlemartin/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l