On Dec 12, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:
No, I mean a journal of opinion which IS peer
reviewed, and an
authority
whose literary criticism has passed such review. In other words,
considered sound, or at least interesting, by a committee.
This is such a complete misrepresentation of what peer reviewed
academic journals are that I don't think there's really an answer for
your question, Fred. The issue seems to be that you don't consider
scholarship in the humanities to be legitimate scholarship, research,
and knowledge. Which, ummm, I would hope that Wikipedia would not be
so presumptuous.
-Phil