On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Phil Sandifer snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
Avoiding making this a de facto RFC on a given article...
Not knowing what article you were talking about, (which is helpful in some situations) my expectation in a reader-role with wikipedia is that articles would have a criticism section if there is significant criticism. I think if there is peer-reviewed criticism I would always consider it significant. So, the addition of a section like this in principle I think is good.
After seeing the diff linked, and the fact that this is the Tori Amos article, yes, I think your audience/local-editorship for this article is probably significantly non-standard, more opinionated, and motivated than most subjects. Tori fans are an interesting demographic.