On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:39 AM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Looks like random stuff was inserted by irregular contributors, and
the subject wasn't notable enough to have a team of editors arguing
over sources and generally keeping an eye on it. We're probably
crammed full of similar articles that are lurking timebombs until the
subject looks himself up says, "this is crap", and rings a journalist.
--
Peter in Canberra