By the way, I didn't say that the subject is "the only person who CAN address the particular specific instance". I said that the responsibility for doing so, rests on them.
We are not and should not feel obligated to root all every negative statement made about every public figure from every page. That would be a truly ridiculous position. We can try to find some, and address some, which we *already do*. And when *others* which can't be simply blanked out (which can by done by anyone) are brought to the attention of oversighters, etc they can be addressed as well. There is no need for anything more than that.
Doing what we're already doing, addresses our own feeling that we should do something versus nothing. But we have no responsibility (note that word) to police the actions of others. There is no crime in progress here.
Will Johnson
************** Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut000500000000... )