On 27/09/2007, Armed Blowfish diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
On 26/09/2007, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
Well, no, that's not what he said at all. But thank-you for proving his point.
Well, if you do not think Wikipaedia should be called an attack site, I assume you will yourself refrain from calling WR, WT, WW, and ED attack sites?
I wonder why you're challenging me to agree to stop doing something I'm not (and something I couldn't care much less about, for that matter). One has to wonder if you actually read the content of this mailing list, or just skim it looking for comments you could use to launch off on tangents about your own pet topics from...
Please, for the love of peace and quiet, will you stop kicking up a vast amount of noise to satisfy your own self-importance, and let us get on with doing some work? There used to be actual discussions here that didn't promptly devolve into nonsense about privacy, ramblings about banning, and other thoroughly unrelated crap, you know. Somewhere or another, we may even have touched on an encyclopedia for more than three messages at a time.
I miss it. There are times this sad state of affairs makes it seem worth throwing in the towel on three years of work and taking up carpentry, just to get away from the sheer navel-gazing futility of it all. Come on, people, we can do better than this.