On 9/24/07, Armed Blowfish diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
Maybe not banning free image providers for the sake of The Bureaucracy (TM) would help.
Which free image providers are banned for the sake of a bureaucracy?
When do you consider an image to be free? If it can't be legally used by someone making a DVD copy of Wikipedia to distribute in Kenya, is it free? If it can't be put into a YouTube video? If it can't be used in a blog post?
I know there's a difference between law and enforcement, and of course fair use can be fairly broadly applied. But focusing on acquiring resources without any potential problems like these seems very reasonable.