"Daniel R. Tobias" wrote
Are we a community based on consensus hashed out in
free-
spirited discussion, or a repressed and secretive group with a rigid
hierarchy and lots of landmines and third-rails in the form of taboo
topics for discussion?
Are we here to work on the encyclopedia, or not? Very importantly, do we allow naked
politics on the site? By that I mean, do we stay with allowing criticism of actions on the
site (which has always been permitted), or would it be OK to impute motives and attack
those, blacken people's reputations, and so on? If so, exactly what good would come of
it?
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam