On 18/09/2007, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Oddly enough I actually agree with this. If I was
banned I wouldn't kick
up
a huge fuss fighting it (even if it really was
unfair) because in those
cases people tend to react against you even more and you'll never hear
the
end of it. Best to just drop it and move on.
That depends how you go about appealing. If you post hundreds on
{{unblock}} tags to your usertalk page, and email wikien-l hundreds of
times, yeah, people are going to react against you. If you send a calm
email to an arbitrator explaining your case, they will open an arbcom
case for you and you'll get your fair hearing (you will probably even
be unblocked so you can participate directly - just don't abuse it,
whatever you do).
(Note: That's the way to deal with bans, not blocks - if you're just
blocked, arbcom is probably overkill.)
Reasonable advice. I guess I just don't have the time or the patience for
wikidrama and ArbCom cases seem like they would be too much effort. Clearly
I am far too apathetic about WP to ever get banned in the first place :P
I've seen quite a few people like that though - newbies who come to WP with
something to contribute, get blocked for NPA when someone bites them for not
filling in form 2451x.2b correctly, and leave in disgust, confused about the
whole thing and lacking the motivation to bother getting unblocked. This
isn't very widespread, but it does happen.
That said, I don't think it's a particularly big deal. If you're getting
banned in the first place you're probably enough of a disruptive element
that it's better for you to (a) leave or (b) get a new account and edit
non-disruptively without the shadow of all the drama over you.