On 9/11/07, Todd Allen <toddmallen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
That's about as far from "minimal
use" as you get, allowing blanket
exceptions based on classes. If we're going to tighten the rules, let's
have nonfree images only when significant, sourced commentary exists on
the image itself. Remember the old saying you can't judge a book by its
cover...
An article on a CD with no image of the CD cover? Ugh. I mean really, yuck.
While we're at it, could someone define "low resolution"? Every editor
uploading an image of a CD cover seems to have to use their own
judgment. A standard size, like 600x600 or something, would be great.
Steve
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
If "ugh" and "yuck" are the only arguments against it,
I'd say that's a
good argument it's decorative.