On 09/09/2007, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/8/07, Armed Blowfish
<diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Wikipaedia is posting negative information about
relatively
private individuals... or are banned users considered so
notable now that BLP does not apply? Are you so determined
to take revenge on those that are banned that you must
destroy their online and offline reputations as much as
possible?
We are not in control of how people ruin their own reputations by
being assholes on Wikipedia. My sympathy for banned users is
generally slight.
-Matt
All banned users are assholes all of the sudden?
Then again, now that I think of it, show me someone
who has never been an 'asshole', and I'll show you
a hermit.
So I suppose, by the same logic, you would support
welcoming links to 'attack sites' and 'outing sites'
on Wikipaedia?