On 09/09/2007, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/8/07, Armed Blowfish diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
Wikipaedia is posting negative information about relatively private individuals... or are banned users considered so notable now that BLP does not apply? Are you so determined to take revenge on those that are banned that you must destroy their online and offline reputations as much as possible?
We are not in control of how people ruin their own reputations by being assholes on Wikipedia. My sympathy for banned users is generally slight.
-Matt
All banned users are assholes all of the sudden?
Then again, now that I think of it, show me someone who has never been an 'asshole', and I'll show you a hermit.
So I suppose, by the same logic, you would support welcoming links to 'attack sites' and 'outing sites' on Wikipaedia?