That sounds like a fine solution. Im not a major fan of stable
versions but this possibility has me intrigued enough to want to try
it.
On 9/8/07, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Brock Weller wrote:
I said usable, not complete. But regardless. Its
not hard to recover
if someone can fit it in, and if they cant, them it stays hidden like
it should. There's no downside to wiping these sections.
If it's hidden in the article history, future editors are a lot less
likely to find it and insert it more smoothly into the text. And the
information becomes unavailable to casual readers in the meantime. That
is a _major_ downside.
Dovetailing in with another thread, this dispute is something that
"stable versions" could work well to resolve. The
trivialess-but-nice-looking version can be marked as the "good" one and
the trivia-containing version can be marked as the "work in progress"
one. Everyone becomes happy.