--- Armed Blowfish diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
On 02/09/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
I'd rather not post a list of those on mod as it may
seem like
personal black marks against them.
If you show such consideration on the list, which does not have particularly high Google rankings, why should it bother you if someone asks for blocked and banned editors to be shown similar consideration on Wikipaedia, which does have very high Google rankings?
I agree with Blowfish & Riddel on this.
Those "moderated"/blocked on Wikipedia and the other wikis are openly known and available for anybody, not just users. Saying the mail moderation list is private is, beside inconsistent and contrary to the otherwise open policy, bordering on stupid CYA antics.
I could understand if it's a size issue. Couldn't that be resolved via dumping it into a compressed file and posting it to media?
~~Pro-Lick http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469