-----Original Message----- From: David Goodman [mailto:dgoodmanny@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 06:10 PM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] [[Views of Lyndon LaRouche]] indefinitely full protected
If there are one or two good generally trusted people preferably with admin powers intent on reverting the nonsense, they can continue to do it. Many of us have a few articles we watch intensively.
Or, assuming we're a community, the situation would be suitable for encouraging wider participation--just as for other contentious matters.
I do recognize that this is perhaps a special case--and I hope will not be followed by attempts from the same quarter to sneak their way into the admins. Personally, I follow JS Mill, that we must be open even to those who would destroy us. If the great majority of the community want to protect it, we will not be destroyed.
_________________________ Yes, good to study them, but important to study them, not just the face they present to the public. That's what a lot of the edit warring is over. Them trying to suppress well-sourced statements of their leader, not meant for public consumption.
Fred