On 20/10/2007, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Charlotte Webb wrote:
Or did you mean "such that the protector intends for it to remain protected until the cows come home?" The latter would be, as Anthony has put strikingly into perspective, an outrageous alternative to blocking the edit warriors (who will undoubtedly reconvene themselves on a different page).
Especially considering that we've got some new quality control mechanisms coming down the pipe that may make it even easier to keep vandals and POV-pushers at bay.
I would assume "indefinite" to mean "indefinite", i.e. without a fixed ending date, rather than rather than "forever." The whole point of the arbcom ruling it was protected under was roving gangs of LaRouche cultists and their endless arrays of sockpuppets, and what to do about them.
- d.