David Gerard wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Inciden...
I mean, what on earth.
For those wondering, this is the site in question:
http://lunasantin.blogspot.com/
And these are the relevant history entry comments from Luna Santin's user page:
08:48 - Gurch: "remove link to attack site"
08:54 - Hoary: "reinstating link to a mild blog that shows no sign of being an 'attack site'"
11:24 - Gurch: "It disusses Wikipedia contributors off-site, that's good enough for WP:BADSITES http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:BADSITES. Yes I know that was rejected, but if people can fail RfA for not enforcing it, clearly it's de facto policy"
11:54 - Lucasbfr: "rv, seriously... I don't see how Luna's blog is a 'website set up for the purpose of or substantially devoted to harassing WP's volunteers' (from the recent RFAr). You should discuss it with Luna"
11:59 - Gurch: "revert"
12:37 - Daniel: "Rubbish, Luna is afforded latitude as an established contributor, and this falls within bounds that consensus currently dictates."
13:23 - Gurch: "(latitude as an established contributor? so Kelly Martin is not an established contributor? how about Gracenotes?"
13:26 - Daniel: "What?"
William