About 2 or three times a month, though, I revert vandalism with the term 'Funny,
but...no.'
Because though I *do* take vandalism seriously, some of it does indeed make me giggle.
From time to time ;-)
S.
David Goodman wrote:
I would not encourage your doing this. Sarcasm is
difficult at best,
and can really hurt--and edit summaries are very visible and almost
impossible to modify.
I know every time I tried even mild sarcasm in any context the
recipient has been offended--and I soon learned better--at least I
hope I have not relapsed.
The nature of edit summaries is rightly a frequent issues at RfA--not
just whether someone is using them or not.
On 10/16/07, James Farrar <james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/10/2007, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> In all fairness, this is probably a consequence of RFA's culture of
"must use 100 percent edit summaries before passing"! ...
Reverts I tend to put a slightly sarcastic
summary on, especially is
it's a clear bad joke. Keeps me amused... :)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l