On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com wrote:
AC cases are one-offs. They really are. They are
supposed to fix up situations by a mixture of equity and safeguarding the Wikipedia
mission. There is no precedent set by a remedy. Principles are pieces of reasoning drawing
on written policy and other things, and are mainly there to connect general understandings
with the bottom line.
If this is so, why has the MONGO case been constantly referred to as if it
is policy?
And how did Arbcom manage to create an exemption to the 3RR if the case is a
one-off?