Alec Conroy wrote:
But that's the impression I'm left with, after
reading the
discussion. If NPOV is non-negotiable, why is its application under
negotiation? And if a policy or principle comes down which isn't
consistent with NPOV-- which one should govern?
NPOV should prevail. The recently
claimed conflict is with "No Personal
Attacks". It's hard to imagine a personal attack that's neutral.
Ec