On 16/10/2007, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/10/2007, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
James Farrar wrote:
Which, in itself, arguably might not be a problem, provided there were a sensible way of determining who "people we don't like" are, and assuming "we" means the community as a whole, not a small subset thereof.
In what way would institutionalizing a particular POV in our content policies _not_ be a problem?
It would emphasise its own absurdity?
That's worked so far! Oh, wait.
Really, the problem with the BADSITES advocates claiming "our position is not BADSITES, it was written by a troll" is that they then follow with actions indistinguishable from BADSITES, and which ignore reductio ad absurdum.
These people seriously wish to trash NPOV and consensus (or even "consensus") for ... what precisely?
- d.