On 16/10/2007, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
James Farrar wrote:
Which, in itself, arguably might not be a problem, provided there were a sensible way of determining who "people we don't like" are, and assuming "we" means the community as a whole, not a small subset thereof.
In what way would institutionalizing a particular POV in our content policies _not_ be a problem?
It would emphasise its own absurdity?