On 14/10/2007, charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com <
charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Fine, then. Deny the problem. Collective unrest
will grow, and when the
ArbCom commands no respect heaven only knows what chaos
will result.
I take it you are announcing your candidacy.
Charles
Goodness, I hope so. Certainly we need people who are willing to grab issues
by the short and curlies, rather than faff around for days on basic points
of policy.
On 14/10/2007, fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info <fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote:
In fact, the situation is so bad, that I think we should consider
alternatives to our current procedures. Is there some other way we could
resolved the issues which come to arbitration, perhaps by committees of
administrators?
Fred
Something like - CSN, perhaps? Somehow I skipped over the MfD but I truly
think that it was a great alternative to the sluggish arbitration process -
input from a varied range of people across the community spectrum, much less
of the snipery that goes on at the arb talkpages (Hkelkar 2 springs
unpleasantly to mind), enforceable sanctions. Quick, nearly painless. Oh
well, not much point talking about the one that got away.
--
Riana
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Riana
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Riana