On 10/11/07, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Nobody is seriously suggesting that Brandt, Bagley, or
any other
nutjob running an attack site be taken seriously. But we can do a
better job of confronting them than removing all links to them. If
somebody who is smart enough and respected enough to write the
headline story for Slate can fall for Brandt's shit, it's probably
time for us to wake up and realize that Brandt is pretty good at what
he does, and needs a response beyond censorship.
I think you should consider that and then consider apologizing for
calling me a troll because I've taken Brandt seriously.
If Brandt is full of shit, prove it. Feel free to do this privately
if you'd like.