On Nov 30, 2007 10:37 AM, Risker
<risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/30/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG
<guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:21:13 -0500, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >David and Guy, both Paul August (in the ANI subpage) and Mackensen
(on
> the
> >Proposed Decisions talk page) have stated that Arbcom did *not*
receive
a
> >copy of the list post; it appears that
many members of Arbcom first
saw
Durova's post when Giano published it on ANI.
My mistake: *some* arbitrators had it, and the rest could have had
it for the asking.
Oh, and Giano could have mailed it not posted it publicly.
Plus that wasn't the crucial piece of information that exonerated !!
(that was never published).
But I guess the words "Giano" and "email" were accurate :-)
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
Guy, it was clear that you had it too, from your posts. It seems absurd
that you would hold Giano to a higher standard than you would hold
yourself. I repeat - NOBODY on any side of this debate emailed that
post to
the Arbcom mailing list. Not one.
Why do you keep repeating this claim when it's simply not true?
It's perfectly true. The individual who forwarded us the post was not a
party to the debate.
Kirill