On 30/11/2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:17:14 -0500, "Alec
Conroy"
<alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>Despite participating in the lists and
receiving the "evidence" email,
>no arbiter has agreed yet agreed to recuse themselves. Flonight and
>Morven are currently the deciding votes in a split-decision at the
>Arbcom case proposing to ban Giano for 90 days for revealing the
>evidence that exonerated !!.
The arbitrators *already had* that evidence,
there was no need for
Giano to post anything.
Indeed. Giano appears to have primarily been going for making a big
splash, i.e. drama-queening.
- d.
David and Guy, both Paul August (in the ANI subpage) and Mackensen (on the
Proposed Decisions talk page) have stated that Arbcom did *not* receive a
copy of the list post; it appears that many members of Arbcom first saw
Durova's post when Giano published it on ANI.