On Nov 29, 2007 10:42 PM, Alec Conroy alecmconroy@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/29/07, joshua.zelinsky@yale.edu joshua.zelinsky@yale.edu wrote:
Being on a list does not make an arbiter so involved as to need to recuse themselves. If we used that level arbiters would need to recuse themselves so frequently we'd rarely have a quorum.
The double-secrect "investigations" list seems more ambiguous. http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wpinvestigations-l
Alec, do you think this deliberately provocative language is helpful? Moderators, perhaps you could step in.
I know it would radically change how I interact with the project
I see that as a positive thing.