On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:31:12 +0000, "Relata Refero" refero.relata@gmail.com wrote:
And to be clear here, what they agreed with was that yes, this undoubtedly was indicative of a returning user. Which, as we know, is precisely the case.
How do you know that that was what they agreed with? Have you seen their personal communication on this subject with Durova? And if they read that 'evidence' and wrote enthusiastically to Durova "yes, definitely a WR troll! Good catch!", I'd like to know who these people are so I can examine their future admin actions a little more closely.
I saw no emails that said /anything like/ "definitely a WR troll! Good catch!" I saw no emails indicating that Durova was considering blocking !!. No evidence has ever been produced that said emails ever existed. All we have is repeated demands that the obvious and innocent explanation is not good enough, and calls for the emails that don't exist. But Alec can't have them because... they don't exist. Durova did not run the block by anybody, as far as I'm aware; certainly not on the lists that everyone is so wound up about. I have checked. None of her emails even hint at a likely block.
Alec is demanding emails. Everybody here who was on the list or in communication with Durova has said that those emails do not exist in the form Alec represents. We have said what actually happened, and Alec's response is repeatably to come right back and demand, yet again, the emails which we say did not exist.
I am becoming increasingly tired of people who were not on the email list and not in active discussion with Durova, telling those of us who were that we are wrong.
Guy (JzG)