On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:22:39 -0500, "Alec Conroy" alecmconroy@gmail.com wrote:
At the very least, if Durova BELIEVED the five people existed, she owes it to us to tell us who they she thought they were, and why she believed it.
Why? Those of us on the lists can confirm that no such conversations took place on the lists, and have repeatedly offered an entirely reasonable explanation, which is that the agreement centred around the (verifiably accurate) supposition that this was not a new user.
Why must you continue to insist that it is more than that?
Or, at the very very very least, she needs to tell Arbcom. There's just no excuse for not telling arbcom that information.
And your evidence that she has not is?....
Guy (JzG)