On Nov 29, 2007 3:51 PM, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 3:45 PM, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 3:17 PM, Relata Refero refero.relata@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 4:14 PM, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
And this after it has been stated unequivocally that no such thing happened. Alec has also been front and center in making other outrageous claims and demands; for example, he seems to believe that if a Wikipedia administrator mentions anything about Wikipedia in a private e-mail, then it is his right to see it (see diff provided above).
Not 'anything about Wikipedia'. If an adminstrator saw that laughable evidence and believed it was grounds for a block, Alec would want to know why. So would a lot of people.
You don't seem to be reading what Alec actually said. He said "Yeah, if someone's an administrator discussing Wikipedia business, the 100% _are_ the business of Arbcom and the community."
"Wikipedia business" <> "anything about Wikipedia"
What, in your mind, would the difference be?