jayjg schreef:
On Nov 28, 2007 12:28 PM, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Durova is perfectly capable of posting the email to Wikipedia herself, everything else aside.
Why on earth should she? It's evidence in an ArbCom case, the ArbCom has seen it. What business is it of yours?
Because the email contained her reasons for blocking a user. These reasons should have been stated iin public when she blocked !!, not on a private list. After all, administrators only can keep the trust of the general Wikipedia population by being as transparant as possible.
I guess that there is an exception when the evidence would invade someone's privacy, but there seems to be no personal information in the mail as quoted at Wikitruth, even though apparently the identity of !! is now known. ("He was a Featured Articles writer and wrote goodness knows how many excellent articles", according to wikipediareview.)
Eugene