On Nov 27, 2007 7:55 PM, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
jayjg wrote:
On 11/27/07, jayjg wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 1:56 PM, Risker wrote:
The fact that ANY administrator believed that a pre-emptive block of a possible sockpuppet was acceptable behaviour is the problem. It is a systemic issue and there is absolutely no reason to believe that Durova is
the only administrator who thought that way; in fact, there seem to be administrators posting in this thread who feel that such actions are perfectly acceptable.
Name them please.
On Nov 27, 2007 2:30 PM, Risker wrote: Well, jayjg, let's put you in this situation. You have elected for your own [long hypothetical story snipped]
Risker, I asked you to name the admins who "believed that a pre-emptive block of a possible sockpuppet was acceptable behaviour." Name them please.
I don't see how naming people will do anything to solve the problem.
Risker made a false claim. I called him on it. He won't name people because no admins in this thread stated that a "pre-emptive block of a possible sockpuppet was acceptable behaviour." End of story.
Personalizing only diverts attention toward the named people when it should be dealing with the systemic issues.
Claiming there are "systemic issues" only diverts attention from the actual facts of the incident.