jayjg wrote:
On 11/27/07, jayjg wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 1:56 PM, Risker wrote:
The fact that ANY administrator believed that a pre-emptive block of a possible sockpuppet was acceptable behaviour is the problem. It is a systemic issue and there is absolutely no reason to believe that Durova is
the only administrator who thought that way; in fact, there seem to be administrators posting in this thread who feel that such actions are perfectly acceptable.
Name them please.
On Nov 27, 2007 2:30 PM, Risker wrote: Well, jayjg, let's put you in this situation. You have elected for your own [long hypothetical story snipped]
Risker, I asked you to name the admins who "believed that a pre-emptive block of a possible sockpuppet was acceptable behaviour." Name them please.
I don't see how naming people will do anything to solve the problem. Personalizing only diverts attention toward the named people when it should be dealing with the systemic issues.
Ec