On 23/11/2007, joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu <joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu> wrote:
Quoting Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com>om>:
Who advocates removal of
otherwise-useful links because the linked-to page (or site)
happens to contain something which is construed as being
harassing of Wikipedians.
Let's be clear. Many of the links in question are harassing Wikipedians by any
reasonable definition. What Michael Moore did was harassment pure and simple.
Some of these cases that isn't what happened (for example Robert Black's blog
had what almost amounted to a debunking of the MI5 claim). But many of the
links we are dealing with are harassing and are done with the aim to make the
lives of Wikipedia editors miserable so that they can be free to alter
Wikipedia text to fit their ends. Let's not lose site of that.
I hate to get back to this, but what did Michael Moore do that
harrassed a wikipedian?
Peter