Quoting Skyring skyring@gmail.com:
On Nov 21, 2007 1:25 PM, joshua.zelinsky@yale.edu wrote:
Quoting Skyring skyring@gmail.com:
On Nov 21, 2007 4:38 AM, Ron Ritzman ritzman@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/20/07, Skyring skyring@gmail.com wrote:
Some admins have the uncanny ability to smell out and ban a sock
without
benefit of CheckUser.
Yes, it's called the "duck test" and it works when said socks go back to doing the same things that got them banned in the first place. Don't do those things and nobody has any reason to suspect you of being a sock.
I was actually thinking of a couple of cases where innocent editors were permanently banned for apparently being my socks.
Give us examples. It is all very nice to claim that this has occurred but we need to see examples.
You don't *need* anything of the sort. I'm not going to bring up details of the uncomfortable past. If you really *want* to see examples, then Wikipedia is an open book and a bit of research will provide all you desire.
If you have examples then you might as well save the time and give them to us. I have other things to do than to look through millions of edits to look for a claimed example of this problem when you could easily point one out. The burden of proof is one you to show an example.