On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:59:54 -0500, "David Goodman" dgoodmanny@gmail.com wrote:
I've just now looked at 25 consecutive items up for speedy. There were: 15 new articles that were valid speedies, and 2 new ones that were not valid speedies (one probably suitable for deletion via prod or afd), 5 older articles that were valid speedies, and 3 that were not, all probably suitable for deletion via prod or afd).
OK, but what do we learn form this? What common factors did you observe in the ones that were not valid? Were there common factors in the nominator's ID?
Guy (JzG)