On Nov 16, 2007 2:19 AM, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:40:35 -0500 (EST), "Fred Bauder" fredbaud@fairpoint.net wrote:
User:Petesmiles? I wonder how anyone came to that conclusion. Anyway, a righteous block, for all sorts of reasons.
"Acting on information received" as they say.
Yes, a righteous block. Pity someone unblocked, really.
Guy (JzG)
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
He spoke up from the one account which was left unblocked and said "I'd really rather use that one than this one".
If you intended to block them all, you should have done that...
I think we have plenty of precedent for letting people who are being restricted to one account pick which one they want to use going forwards.