On 15/11/2007, William Pietri <william(a)scissor.com> wrote:
Really, the only goal is to let readers know that they
are not receiving
a good article, as with {{Unbalanced}} or {{POV}}. And like those
warnings, we don't need to say which way we think the article might be
bent. We just have to let readers know that they're not getting what
they get out of most of our articles: a quick, balanced take on some
topic of interest to them.
A 'chilling effects' tag ... man, that'll be all over the press in seconds.
I'd run it past Sandra Ordonez (Foundation PR) and Mike Godwin
(Foundation lawyer) before proceeding wholeheartedly.
(Can I say that my inner troublemaker is most pleased at the notion?
That doesn't make it a good one, of course ;-)
- d.