On 15/11/2007, William Pietri william@scissor.com wrote:
Really, the only goal is to let readers know that they are not receiving a good article, as with {{Unbalanced}} or {{POV}}. And like those warnings, we don't need to say which way we think the article might be bent. We just have to let readers know that they're not getting what they get out of most of our articles: a quick, balanced take on some topic of interest to them.
A 'chilling effects' tag ... man, that'll be all over the press in seconds.
I'd run it past Sandra Ordonez (Foundation PR) and Mike Godwin (Foundation lawyer) before proceeding wholeheartedly.
(Can I say that my inner troublemaker is most pleased at the notion? That doesn't make it a good one, of course ;-)
- d.