On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:44:42 -0500, joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu wrote:
It is clear that if Brandt were not Brandt it
would have
been almost certainly kept.
If he were not Brandt then we would not have had the article in the
first place, let's remember that.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG