On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:56:10 -0800, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
> Maybe we did, back when we had fewer than two
million articles and
> fewer than a million users, and were not a top-ten site making us an
> essential part of any vanity, spam or POV-pushing campaign.
Why should our behaviour as a top-ten site change from
the behaviour
that got us there? The faults that you list did not suddenly spring-up
when we became a top-ten site. They have all scaled up very well, but
that was always predictable.
I wonder if Judd Bagley would have gone to such lengths two years
ago?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG