Fred Bauder wrote:
Either one
goes against the animating spirit of the project:
Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given
free access to the sum of all human knowledge.
But not the sum of all human speculation.
As I've said before, Fred, I feel you have an unfortunate habit of
replying to a long message, and making one short argumentative reply,
often apparently tangential to the main point of the post you're
replying to. I think this does little to advance the discussion.
Certainly it rarely helps me understand what you're talking about. All
the more so when you give several replies like that in a thread.
If you'd like to make a concrete point here, I'd suggest you go for a
couple of paragraphs, stating whatever it is that you're trying to state
from first principles, and showing how you'd apply them in this
particular situation.
On the upside, I see you've switched over to a mail client that is more
compliant with standards. Thanks for that.
William
--
William Pietri <william(a)scissor.com>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:William_Pietri