On Nov 1, 2007 2:32 PM, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
The debate is about whether someone can arbitrarily declare someone else's behaviour trolling, for doing something we'd previously tolerated, and ban them indefinitely.
[snip]
I don't think this is the subject of the debate either, at least that particular statement of it isn't very good...
When we indef. ban a user's "single purpose" sock and try to avoid banning the primary account, we haven't banned *the user* indefinitely.